The AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships are the world’s largest 3-on-3 debating tournament, and the second largest debating tournament in the world. It is held in early July each year, with upwards of 100 teams competing for the title of AustralAsian champions. Australs has been hosted in Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore.
About Australs
The Championship comprises at least 7 preliminary rounds of debates, and 4 finals rounds, including an English as a Second Language Competition.
The aims of the Australasian Intervarsity are:
Style of Debate
The AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships has its own unique debating style, generally referred to as Australs style.
Australs style debating consist of two teams of three speakers each, one team taking the role of the Affirmative, and the other the Negative. Speeches are heard alternately from the Affirmative and Negative, and have a duration of six to eight minutes. At the conclusion of the six substantive speeches, each team gets the opportunity to deliver a short Reply Speech of four minutes which wraps up the debate for each side. Both teams are given 30 minutes to prepare their speeches, from the time the topic is announced.
Variants of Australs style are used all over the world, including the World Schools’ Debating Championship, which uses Australs style with the addition of points of information.
The rules of debate can be found in the Australia-Asia Debating Handbook, which can be viewed by linking here {link to training page}. Other rules, including the definitional rule are contained in Article 28 of the AIDA constitution.
2008, Ateneo Australs
Final: Weapons
That international institutions should use force to restrict the sale of small arms to African nations
That gun ownership should be restricted to law enforcement agencies
That we should rely on mutual assured destruction rather than on nuclear non-proliferation
Semis: Pedophilia
That we would abolish the crime of statutory rape
That police officers should be banned from posing as children on the internet to catch pedophiles
That capital punishment should be allowed in cases of child rape
Quarters: US Racial Politics
That we should vote for Barack Obama on the basis of his race
That low-income ethnic neighborhoods should be protected from gentrification
That Latinos should have the right to be taught in Spanish
Octos: Health
That hymen reconstruction surgeries should be banned
That IVF clinics should be stopped from implanting embryos known to have disabilities
That all restrictions on the advertising of prescription drugs should be removed
ESL Final: Energy
That the price of petrol should be determined entirely by the market
That we would drill for oil in the arctic circle
That the production of non-hybrid cars should be stopped
ESL Semis: Immigration
That industrialized nations should be forced to accept climate change refugees
That states should remove all restrictions against the immigration of HIV-infected people
That medical workers from developing countries should not be allowed to migrate to the developed world
Round 1: Conflict Zones
That the UN should hire mercenaries for military operations
That African states should recognize Tsvangirai as the rightful leader of Zimbabwe
That we would respect China's right to prosecute foreign athletes who protest at the Beijing Olympics
Round 2: Sin
That we would ban groups that glorify obesity
That governments should not take any action to discourage individuals from smoking
That problem gamblers should have their welfare payments suspended
Round 3: Philippines
That we should end US involvement in fighting terrorism in Southern Mindanao
That we have had enough People Power revolutions
That the Philippines should adopt Chavez-style land reforms
Round 4: Business and Trade
That corporate regulators should have veto power over executive bonuses
That we would protect nationally important companies from ownership by foreign government entities
That the WTO should abandon consensus voting as the basis for decision-making
Round 5: Sustainable Development
That areas of high ecological value should be returned to indigenous peoples for management
That arable lands should not be used for growing crops for bio-fuels
That individuals should be given carbon quotas
Round 6: Bois and Grrrls
That we would create separate units for gays in the military
That governments should ban groups that seek to 'straighten out' gay men and women
That we would allow minors to have sex change operations
Round 7: Science and Tech
That all state-funded projects should be open source
That genetic research that attributes negative traits to particular races should not be pubilshed
That nations should be able to charge licensing fees for the use of genetic information from their native plants and animals
Round 8: Democracy
That candidates should be disallowed from using their own money to finance their campaigns
That the West should cease pressuring transitioning democracies to hold elections
That we would abolish political parties
Women's debate:
That pre and post opt transsexuals should be allowed into women-only organizations
While every Australs is different, traditionally the championship has consisted of the following elements:
Day 1:
Day 2:
Day 3:
Day 4:
Day 5:
Day 6:
Day 7:
Day 8:
The host of the 2009 AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships are Monash University.
Their website can be found at: http://www.monashaustrals.com/home.html.
Past Hosts
The AustralAsian intervarsity is held early in July each year, and hosted by a different institution each year. It was first held in 1975, originally as the Australian Intervarsity Debating Championships. The 1990s saw increasing participation from Asia and New Zealand which lead to the tournament receiving its current name.
|
Year
|
Champions
|
Runners-Up
|
Hosts
|
|
2009
|
Monash University
|
||
|
2008
|
University of Sydney
|
Monash University
|
Ateneo De Manila University
|
|
2007
|
University of Queensland
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
Universiti Teknologi Mara
|
|
2006
|
Monash University
|
University of Melbourne
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
2005
|
University of Sydney
|
Ateneo de Manila University
|
University of Queensland
|
|
2004
|
Monash University
|
Multimedia University
|
University of Technology, Sydney
|
|
2003
|
University of Sydney
|
Monash University
|
Multimedia University
|
|
2002
|
University of Melbourne
|
Australian National University
|
University of Melbourne
|
|
2001
|
Monash University
|
University of Melbourne
|
Nanyang Technological University
|
|
2000
|
Monash University
|
Monash University
|
|
|
1999
|
University of Sydney
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
|
1998
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
University of Sydney
|
|
|
1997
|
University of Sydney
|
De La Salle University
|
|
|
1996
|
Monash University
|
Australian National University
|
|
|
1995
|
University of Sydney
|
Monash University
|
|
|
1994
|
Macquarie University
|
University of Tasmania
|
|
|
1993
|
Monash University
|
International Islamic University
|
|
|
1992
|
Monash University
|
University of Sydney
|
|
|
1991
|
Australian National University
|
University of Melbourne
|
|
|
1990
|
University of Sydney
|
University of Adelaide
|
|
|
1989
|
Australian National University
|
Australian National University
|
|
|
1988
|
University of Sydney
|
National University of Singapore
|
|
|
1987
|
University of Sydney
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
|
1986
|
University of Sydney
|
University of Melbourne
|
|
|
1985
|
University of Sydney
|
University of Auckland
|
|
|
1984
|
University of New South Wales
|
||
|
1983
|
University of Adelaide
|
||
|
1982
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
|
1981
|
University of Sydney
|
Monash University
|
|
|
1980
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
University of Canterbury
|
|
|
1979
|
University of Sydney
|
||
|
1978
|
University of Sydney
|
||
|
1977
|
|||
|
1976
|
University of Melbourne
|
||
|
1975
|
University of Sydney
|
The Best Speaker Award was first given in 1989. In 1994, it became the "Martin Sorensen Best Speaker Prize" in honour of the well-liked Monash University debater who died only days after winning the award for the second time. It is awarded to the debater with the highest total sum of speaker scores in the preliminary rounds of competition.
|
Year
|
Speaker
|
University
|
|
2009
|
||
|
2008
|
Naomi Oreb
|
University of Sydney
|
|
2007
|
Sayeqa Islam
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
2006
|
Elizabeth Sheargold
|
University of Melbourne
|
|
2005
|
Ivan Ah Sam
|
University of Sydney
|
|
2004
|
Matthew Kenneally
|
Australian National University
|
|
2003
|
Tim Sonnreich
|
Monash University
|
|
2002
|
Tim Sonnreich
|
Monash University
|
|
2001
|
Steve Bell
|
University of Melbourne
|
|
2000
|
Kim Little
|
Monash University
|
|
1999
|
Dan Celm
|
Monash University
|
|
1998
|
Praba Ganesan
|
De La Salle University
|
|
1997
|
Chris Fladgate
|
Monash University
|
|
1996
|
Lizzie Knight
Phillip Senior |
Monash University
Universty of Western Australia |
|
1995
|
Christian Porter
Matthew Richardson |
University of Western Australia
University of New South Wales |
|
1994
|
Tony Burke
|
University of Sydney
|
|
1993
|
Martin Sorensen
|
Monash University
|
|
1992
|
Martin Sorensen
|
Monash University
|
|
1991
|
Julian Beckedahl
Rufus Black |
Monash University
University of Melbourne |
|
1990
|
Camilla Newcombe
|
Australian National University
|
|
1989
|
Richard Douglas
|
Australian National University
|
|
Year
|
Speaker
|
University
|
|
2007
|
Sayeqa Islam
|
Victoria University of Wellington
|
|
2006
|
Roland Dillon
|
Monash University
|
AIDA welcomes the participation of non-Australasian teams and adjudicators in the AustralAsian Championships. Past Championships have seen debaters and adjudicators from North America, the United Kingdom, and South Africa participate.
If you are from outside Australasia and interested in coming to the Championships, please contact the Organising Committee at the earliest opportunity.
Debaters - Restriction on participation
Article 24 of our governing Constitution prevents teams from outside the AustralAsian region contesting the final series.
This means that non-AustralAsian teams can compete in the preliminary rounds, but will be ineligible to make the break. A minimum of 7 preliminary rounds are held at each AustralAsian tournament.
If you have any queries as to whether you are an AustralAsian or Non-AustralAsian team, please contact the AIDA President.
Please note also that teams from outside the AustralAsian region will be subject to normal eligibility criteria, including the affirmative action requirement (one-third of debating contingent must be female). For more information on eligibility, please refer to Articles 22 and 23 of the AIDA Constitution.
Adjudicators:
There are no restrictions on the participation of non-AustralAsian adjudicators at the Championships. Such adjudicators are generally described as “independent” adjudicators.
An Independent adjudicator is an adjudicator who is not or no longer enrolled in a member institution of AIDA.
Independent adjudicators should apply directly to the Chief Adjudicator of the AustralAsian Championships, along with a copy of the debating and adjudication CV.
Independent adjudicators should note that strong preference is given to adjudicators that have passed the AIDA Adjudication Accreditation test. Such accredited adjudicators are also given a discount on their registration fees. Independent adjudicators are welcome to sit the AIDA accreditation test prior to the Championships. To get a copy of the Accreditation package, please email your full name and postal address to the Vice President of Adjudication
Independent adjudicators should note that as per Article 25.3 of the AIDA Constitution, adjudicators are only eligible to be selected for adjudication of the final series if they have adjudicated at least 5 preliminary rounds.
Resources for non-AustralAsian teams:
Except for the rule on definitions, the rules of the AustralAsian Championships are contained in the Australian Debating Federation Handbook. This handbook is currently being put into electronic format, and we hope to have it available on this site soon. This handbook is an extremely valuable resource, and we recommend that all non-AustralAsian teams read it before attending the Championships. To obtain a copy, please contact the Vice-President of Adjudication.
For the definitional rules, please see Article 28 of the AIDA constitution.
All debaters and adjudicators also receive a briefing on the rules on the first day of the AustralAsian Championships.