Australs

The AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships are the world’s largest 3-on-3 debating tournament, and the second largest debating tournament in the world.  It is held in early July each year, with upwards of 100 teams competing for the title of AustralAsian champions. Australs has been hosted in Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore.

About Australs

The Championship comprises at least 7 preliminary rounds of debates, and 4 finals rounds, including an English as a Second Language Competition. 

The aims of the Australasian Intervarsity are:

  1. To further debating in the AustralAsian region.
  2. To promote the exchange of ideas and skills between participants and the wider community.
  3. To encourage participation from universities not already participating.


Style of Debate

The AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships has its own unique debating style, generally referred to as Australs style.

Australs style debating consist of two teams of three speakers each, one team taking the role of the Affirmative, and the other the Negative. Speeches are heard alternately from the Affirmative and Negative, and have a duration of six to eight minutes. At the conclusion of the six substantive speeches, each team gets the opportunity to deliver a short Reply Speech of four minutes which wraps up the debate for each side. Both teams are given 30 minutes to prepare their speeches, from the time the topic is announced.

Variants of Australs style are used all over the world, including the World Schools’ Debating Championship, which uses Australs style with the addition of points of information.

The rules of debate can be found in the Australia-Asia Debating Handbook, which can be viewed by linking here {link to training page}. Other rules, including the definitional rule are contained in Article 28 of the AIDA constitution.

Motions

2008, Ateneo Australs

Final: Weapons
That international institutions should use force to restrict the sale of small arms to African nations
That gun ownership should be restricted to law enforcement agencies
That we should rely on mutual assured destruction rather than on nuclear non-proliferation

Semis: Pedophilia
That we would abolish the crime of statutory rape
That police officers should be banned from posing as children on the internet to catch pedophiles
That capital punishment should be allowed in cases of child rape

Quarters: US Racial Politics
That we should vote for Barack Obama on the basis of his race
That low-income ethnic neighborhoods should be protected from gentrification
That Latinos should have the right to be taught in Spanish

Octos: Health
That hymen reconstruction surgeries should be banned
That IVF clinics should be stopped from implanting embryos known to have disabilities
That all restrictions on the advertising of prescription drugs should be removed

ESL Final: Energy
That the price of petrol should be determined entirely by the market
That we would drill for oil in the arctic circle
That the production of non-hybrid cars should be stopped

ESL Semis: Immigration
That industrialized nations should be forced to accept climate change refugees
That states should remove all restrictions against the immigration of HIV-infected people
That medical workers from developing countries should not be allowed to migrate to the developed world

Round 1: Conflict Zones
That the UN should hire mercenaries for military operations
That African states should recognize Tsvangirai as the rightful leader of Zimbabwe
That we would respect China's right to prosecute foreign athletes who protest at the Beijing Olympics

Round 2: Sin
That we would ban groups that glorify obesity
That governments should not take any action to discourage individuals from smoking
That problem gamblers should have their welfare payments suspended

Round 3: Philippines
That we should end US involvement in fighting terrorism in Southern Mindanao
That we have had enough People Power revolutions
That the Philippines should adopt Chavez-style land reforms

Round 4: Business and Trade
That corporate regulators should have veto power over executive bonuses
That we would protect nationally important companies from ownership by foreign government entities
That the WTO should abandon consensus voting as the basis for decision-making

Round 5: Sustainable Development
That areas of high ecological value should be returned to indigenous peoples for management
That arable lands should not be used for growing crops for bio-fuels
That individuals should be given carbon quotas

Round 6: Bois and Grrrls
That we would create separate units for gays in the military
That governments should ban groups that seek to 'straighten out' gay men and women
That we would allow minors to have sex change operations

Round 7: Science and Tech
That all state-funded projects should be open source
That genetic research that attributes negative traits to particular races should not be pubilshed
That nations should be able to charge licensing fees for the use of genetic information from their native plants and animals

Round 8: Democracy
That candidates should be disallowed from using their own money to finance their campaigns
That the West should cease pressuring transitioning democracies to hold elections
That we would abolish political parties

Women's debate:
That pre and post opt transsexuals should be allowed into women-only organizations

Schedule

While every Australs is different, traditionally the championship has consisted of the following elements:

Day 1:

  • Registration
  • Welcoming party


Day 2:

  • Adjudicator test
  • AIDA Pre-council
  • Opening Ceremony

Day 3:

  • Rounds 1-3

Day 4:

  • Rounds 4-5
  • Women’s Debate

Day 5:

  • Round 6-8 (traditionally, the final two rounds of the Championship are ‘closed’, so that no oral adjudication is given)
  • Break Night Party, at which the finalists are announced

Day 6:

  • Break Day
  • AIDA Council

Day 7:

  • Main Break Octo-finals and Quarter-finals
  • ESL Quarter-finals and Semi-finals
  • Championship Dinner

Day 8:

  • Main Break Semi-finals
  • ESL Final
  • Championship Final
  • Final Night Party

Hosts

The host of the 2009 AustralAsian Intervarsity Debating Championships are Monash University.

Their website can be found at: http://www.monashaustrals.com/home.html.

 

Past Hosts

  • 2008: Ateneo de Manila University, The Philippines
  • 2007 : UT Mara, Malaysia
  • 2006 : Victoria University, New Zealand
  • 2005 : University of Queensland, Australia
  • 2004 : University Technology Sydney, Australia
  • 2003 : Multimedia University, Malaysia
  • 2002 : Melbourne University, Australia
  • 2001 : Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  • 2000 : Monash University, Australia

History

The AustralAsian intervarsity is held early in July each year, and hosted by a different institution each year. It was first held in 1975, originally as the Australian Intervarsity Debating Championships. The 1990s saw increasing participation from Asia and New Zealand which lead to the tournament receiving its current name.

Year
Champions
Runners-Up
Hosts
2009
Monash University
2008
University of Sydney
Monash University
Ateneo De Manila University
2007
University of Queensland
Victoria University of Wellington
Universiti Teknologi Mara
2006
Monash University
University of Melbourne
Victoria University of Wellington
2005
University of Sydney
Ateneo de Manila University
University of Queensland
2004
Monash University
Multimedia University
University of Technology, Sydney
2003
University of Sydney
Monash University
Multimedia University
2002
University of Melbourne
Australian National University
University of Melbourne
2001
Monash University
University of Melbourne
Nanyang Technological University
2000
Monash University
Monash University
1999
University of Sydney
Victoria University of Wellington
1998
Victoria University of Wellington
University of Sydney
1997
University of Sydney
De La Salle University
1996
Monash University
Australian National University
1995
University of Sydney
Monash University
1994
Macquarie University
University of Tasmania
1993
Monash University
International Islamic University
1992
Monash University
University of Sydney
1991
Australian National University
University of Melbourne
1990
University of Sydney
University of Adelaide
1989
Australian National University
Australian National University
1988
University of Sydney
National University of Singapore
1987
University of Sydney
Victoria University of Wellington
1986
University of Sydney
University of Melbourne
1985
University of Sydney
University of Auckland
1984
University of New South Wales
1983
University of Adelaide
1982
Victoria University of Wellington
Victoria University of Wellington
1981
University of Sydney
Monash University
1980
Victoria University of Wellington
University of Canterbury
1979
University of Sydney
1978
University of Sydney
1977
1976
University of Melbourne
1975
University of Sydney


Martin Sorensen Prize for Best Speaker in the Tournament


The Best Speaker Award was first given in 1989. In 1994, it became the "Martin Sorensen Best Speaker Prize" in honour of the well-liked Monash University debater who died only days after winning the award for the second time. It is awarded to the debater with the highest total sum of speaker scores in the preliminary rounds of competition.

 

Year
Speaker
University
2009
2008
Naomi Oreb
University of Sydney
2007
Sayeqa Islam
Victoria University of Wellington
2006
Elizabeth Sheargold
University of Melbourne
2005
Ivan Ah Sam
University of Sydney
2004
Matthew Kenneally
Australian National University
2003
Tim Sonnreich
Monash University
2002
Tim Sonnreich
Monash University
2001
Steve Bell
University of Melbourne
2000
Kim Little
Monash University
1999
Dan Celm
Monash University
1998
Praba Ganesan
De La Salle University
1997
Chris Fladgate
Monash University
1996
Lizzie Knight
Phillip Senior
Monash University
Universty of Western Australia
1995
Christian Porter
Matthew Richardson
University of Western Australia
University of New South Wales
1994
Tony Burke
University of Sydney
1993
Martin Sorensen
Monash University
1992
Martin Sorensen
Monash University
1991
Julian Beckedahl
Rufus Black
Monash University
University of Melbourne
1990
Camilla Newcombe
Australian National University
1989
Richard Douglas
Australian National University


Jock Fanselow Cup for Best Speaker in the Grand Final

 

Year
Speaker
University
2007
Sayeqa Islam
Victoria University of Wellington
2006
Roland Dillon
Monash University

Other Resources

Invitational Teams

AIDA welcomes the participation of non-Australasian teams and adjudicators in the AustralAsian Championships. Past Championships have seen debaters and adjudicators from North America, the United Kingdom, and South Africa participate.

If you are from outside Australasia and interested in coming to the Championships, please contact the Organising Committee at the earliest opportunity.

Debaters - Restriction on participation

Article 24 of our governing Constitution prevents teams from outside the AustralAsian region contesting the final series.

This means that non-AustralAsian teams can compete in the preliminary rounds, but will be ineligible to make the break. A minimum of 7 preliminary rounds are held at each AustralAsian tournament.

If you have any queries as to whether you are an AustralAsian or Non-AustralAsian team, please contact the AIDA President.

Please note also that teams from outside the AustralAsian region will be subject to normal eligibility criteria, including the affirmative action requirement (one-third of debating contingent must be female). For more information on eligibility, please refer to Articles 22 and 23 of the AIDA Constitution.

Adjudicators:

There are no restrictions on the participation of non-AustralAsian adjudicators at the Championships. Such adjudicators are generally described as “independent” adjudicators.

An Independent adjudicator is an adjudicator who is not or no longer enrolled in a member institution of AIDA.

Independent adjudicators should apply directly to the Chief Adjudicator of the AustralAsian Championships, along with a copy of the debating and adjudication CV.

Independent adjudicators should note that strong preference is given to adjudicators that have passed the AIDA Adjudication Accreditation test. Such accredited adjudicators are also given a discount on their registration fees. Independent adjudicators are welcome to sit the AIDA accreditation test prior to the Championships. To get a copy of the Accreditation package, please email your full name and postal address to the Vice President of Adjudication

Independent adjudicators should note that as per Article 25.3 of the AIDA Constitution, adjudicators are only eligible to be selected for adjudication of the final series if they have adjudicated at least 5 preliminary rounds.

Resources for non-AustralAsian teams:

Except for the rule on definitions, the rules of the AustralAsian Championships are contained in the Australian Debating Federation Handbook. This handbook is currently being put into electronic format, and we hope to have it available on this site soon. This handbook is an extremely valuable resource, and we recommend that all non-AustralAsian teams read it before attending the Championships. To obtain a copy, please contact the Vice-President of Adjudication.

For the definitional rules, please see Article 28 of the AIDA constitution.

All debaters and adjudicators also receive a briefing on the rules on the first day of the AustralAsian Championships.